Pictures of Messier 42 object under light polluted site

Astrophotography of deep sky objects is quite challenging in a highly light polluted area. The nearest dark site from where I live is a two-hour drive and I cannot really make it very often. That’s why I try out techniques to take Deep Sky Object pictures in light polluted site …  Fortunately with DSLR cameras, light pollution Filters, and Image processing, there are some ways of making some interesting pictures.  I’ll post my experiment and findings…

Given the name of this Blog, the place of honor should come to M42 – the “Great Nebula”.  It is also a very easy object to work with. Even in a light polluted site it is (almost) visible with the naked eye.

I took Pictures of M42 with the Orion Eon 72mm and Orion 102ED. The pictures were taken from San Bruno, CA (near the San Francisco  airport) and I used  a light pollution filter (Orion SkyGlow Imaging Telescope Filters 2″) for the 102ED shots.

Orion M42, M43 and NGC1977 with Orion Eon 72mm

Taken on 11/30/2008 at 11.30pm PST: stack of 12 frames of 120sec each with Canon XTi – 400 asa – processed with  Max DSLR and Corel Paintshop. With Corel Paintshop I used the “Histogram adjustment” and “Unsharp Mask” tools to increase contrast and brightness. The picture had to be cropped as the Eon 72mm shows some serious coma at the edge of the image…  But for a $350 scope the result is not bad (black friday’s promotion at Orion). I am thinking of using it as a grab-and-go scope, a wide field astrophotography scope, and even for taking daylight pictures.

11302008_m42_12fr

I used the mount tracking (Sirius EQ-G) – no guidescope. With such a short focal and short exposure time, guided scopes are not a hard requirement, if you do a great polar alignment of your telescope mount.

Orion M42, M43, and NGC1977 with Orion 102ED

Taken on 12/07/2008 at 2.45am – San Bruno, CA.

This picture was taken using the Orion SkyGlow Imaging Telescope Filters 2″. The background was definitely darker with the filter. Even though there are less pictures stacked than above with the Eon 72mm, the final result looks Ok and with more details than the shot taken with the Eon 72mm.

The picture is a stack of 4 frames of 164sec each with Canon XTi – 400 asa – processed with  Max DSLR and Corel Paintshop. With Corel I used the “Histogram adjustment” and “Unsharp Mask” tools to increase contrast and brightness. The picture had to be slightly cropped but did not exhibit as much coma as with the Eon 72mm. I used the “Lasso” tool to selectively increase the brightness and contract of  NGC 1977.  I used the mount tracking (using a Sirius EQ-G) – no guidescope. I had to scrap 4 pictures out of 8 because either the tracking was not great or the focus was not good enough. The polar alignment has to be carefully done to take exposure of +160 seconds and does not guarantee well tracked images if you don’t use (as I did) a guidescope.

M42, M43 and NGC 1977 – Orion ED102

12072008_m42m43ngc1977_4fr212072008_m42m43ngc1977_4fr_name

Same picture cropped –  more details on M42 and M43.

n714828571_1731360_9346

  1. #1 by Karol on January 8, 2013 - 10:54 am

    Hello from Que9bec !I have a nexstar 8se and I take putcires of the sun ,the moon ,the planets.I would like to go further and give a try with deep sky imaging ,but I dont have any reference photos and datas from other 8se owners!My scope is on an heavy duty wedge !I see someone has a set up with an 8se. can I see some pics and some datas from thatastrobuddy??thank you !Maxx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: